We hope we have convinced the reader that the system cannot be reformed in such a way as to reconcile freedom with technology. The only way out is to dispense with the industrial-technological system altogether. This implies revolution, not necessarily an armed uprising, but certainly a radical and fundamental change in the nature of society.
Ted Kaczynski Connected to the Carolinas
Source
"Revolution is Easier Than Reform", paragraph 140
- work
- Industrial Society and Its Future (1995)
- year
- 1995
Cite this record
“We hope we have convinced the reader that the system cannot …” Ted Kaczynski. Carolina Quotes, record CQ-109A51CED7. https://carolinaquotes.com/quote/109a51ced7
More from Ted Kaczynski
The development of a society can never be subject to rational human control.
It seems amazing that those who advocate energy conservation haven't noticed what happens: As soon as some energy is freed up by conservation, the technological world-system gobbles it up and demands more. No matter how much energy is provided, the system always expands rapidly until it is using all available energy, and then it demands still more.
The techno-industrial system is exceptionally tough due to its so-called "democratic" structure and its resulting flexibility. Because dictatorial systems tend to be rigid, social tensions and resistance can be built up in them to the point where they damage and weaken the system and may lead to revolution. But in a "democratic" system, when social tension and resistance build up dangerously the system backs off enough, it compromises enough, to bring the tensions down to a safe level.