We argue that in order to deal with the various inertial pressures the adaptation perspective must be supplemented with a selection orientation. We consider first two broad issues that are preliminary to ecological modelling. The first concerns appropriate units of analysis. Typical analyses of the relation of organizations to environments take the point of view of a single organization facing an environment.
Michael T. Hannan Connected to the Carolinas
Source
p. 933
- work
- "The Population Ecology of Organizations," 1977
- year
- 1977
- locator
- p. 933
Cite this record
“We argue that in order to deal with the various inertial pre…” Michael T. Hannan. Carolina Quotes, record CQ-502E989422. https://carolinaquotes.com/quote/502e989422
More from Michael T. Hannan
Natural selection, as it is actually used in evolutionary population biology, serves mainly as an optimization process. In fact, the reasoning that underlies much evolutionary biology often strikes social scientists as strongly reminiscent of neoclassical economics.
Inertial pressures prevent most organizations from radically changing strategies and structures.
A system with greater organizational diversity has a higher probability of having in hand some form that does a reasonably satisfactory job of dealing with the changed environmental conditions. Adaptation in such a system means reallocating resources from one type of existing organization to another, either by command or by market mechanisms, rather than trying to identify and create appropriate organizational forms.