So the real question, I believe, is not whether some ARA's use violence. The real question is whether they are justified in doing so. Here are the main outlines of a possible justification. 1. Animals are innocent. 2. Violence is used only when it is necessary to rescue them so that they are spared terrible harms. 3. Excessive violence is never used. 4. Violence is used only after nonviolent alternatives have been exhausted, as time and circumstances permit. 5. Therefore, in these cases, the use of violence is justified.
Tom Regan Carolinian
Source
How to Justify Violence, p. 233
- work
- Terrorists or Freedom Fighters? Reflections on the Liberation of Animals (2004)
- year
- 2004
- locator
- p. 233
Cite this record
“So the real question, I believe, is not whether some ARA's u…” Tom Regan. Carolina Quotes, record CQ-76CB2D921A. https://carolinaquotes.com/quote/76cb2d921a
More from Tom Regan
The task facing ARAs is daunting: we must empty the cages, not make them larger.
Then there are those proverbial “bird brains” of the barnyard, chickens, surely the most maligned and abused animal on the face of the earth, and—just as surely—among the brightest, most social birds we'll find anywhere. … Chickens not only are capable of learning, they are also capable of teaching one another. It turns out that chickens are not as dumb as popular mythology makes them out to be.
I would never have become an animal rights advocate if I had not first been a human rights advocate, especially for those humans (the very young and the very old, for example) who lack the understanding or power to assert their rights for themselves.