This article [entitled A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations], was one of three independent statements in 1967 of what came to be called "contingency theory." It held that the structure of an organization depends upon (is ‘contingent’ upon) the kind of task performed, rather than upon some universal principles that apply to all organizations. The notion was in the wind at the time.
Charles Perrow Connected to the Carolinas
Source
No citation is recorded for this quotation.
- work
- 1980s and later
no citation recorded
Cite this record
“This article [entitled A framework for the comparative analy…” Charles Perrow. Carolina Quotes, record CQ-AA940DA800. https://carolinaquotes.com/quote/aa940da800
More from Charles Perrow
From one point of view, structure is a part of technology; for example the spread of the bureaucratic form of organization might be said to be the most profound technological innovation in the last 3 or 4 centuries.
While [bureaucratic] solutions have been frequently criticized by those within and without the organization, no alternative way has been found to cope with the problem of organizing large numbers of people to produce goods and services efficiently.
People do not exist just for organizations. They track all kinds of mud from the rest of their lives into the organization, and they have all kinds of interests that are independent of the organization.